Browse chapters
1C · Biomolecules and the chemistry of life
Transmission of heritable information and genetic diversity
How traits pass from parents to offspring (Mendelian genetics) and how meiosis, crossing over, and mutation shuffle the deck so offspring aren't clones. Scales up to population genetics — how allele frequencies and evolution play out across a whole population.
Mendelian genetics
Traits are determined by alleles (versions of a gene). Mendel's two laws — segregation and independent assortment — predict offspring ratios, which Punnett squares lay out.
A few definitions unlock the whole topic, then two laws and the patterns that complicate them. Most MCAT genetics is applying these to a cross and reading off a ratio.
The vocabulary of inheritance
Genotype (genetic makeup) vs. phenotype (observable trait); alleles at a locus; homozygous (two same alleles) vs. heterozygous (two different); dominant alleles mask recessive ones.
A gene sits at a locus; its variants are alleles. An organism with two identical alleles is homozygous, with two different ones heterozygous. The dominant allele's phenotype shows in heterozygotes; the recessive phenotype appears only when homozygous recessive. Genotype is the allele combination; phenotype is what you observe (set by genotype plus environment).
Mendel's laws & the Punnett square
Law of segregation: the two alleles of a gene separate into different gametes. Law of independent assortment: alleles of different genes sort independently. A monohybrid cross of two heterozygotes gives a 3:1 phenotype ratio; a dihybrid gives 9:3:3:1.
Segregation falls out of meiosis (homologs separate, so each gamete gets one allele). Independent assortment holds for genes on different chromosomes (or far apart on one). A Punnett square enumerates gamete combinations:
| B | b | |
|---|---|---|
| B | BB | Bb |
| b | Bb | bb |
Bb × Bb → 1 BB : 2 Bb : 1 bb (genotype), i.e. 3 dominant : 1 recessive phenotype. A test cross (organism × homozygous recessive) reveals whether a dominant-phenotype individual is homozygous or heterozygous.
Beyond simple dominance
Complete dominance (one allele masks the other), incomplete dominance (heterozygote is a blend — red × white → pink), and codominance (both alleles fully expressed — AB blood type). Genes can have multiple alleles in the population (ABO).
Incomplete dominance gives an intermediate phenotype (the heterozygote looks "in between"). Codominance shows both phenotypes simultaneously, not a blend — the AB blood group (both A and B antigens) and sickle-cell trait are the examples. The ABO system also illustrates multiple alleles (Iᴬ, Iᴮ, i): a population carries more than two allele versions even though each person has only two.
Don't confuse
Incomplete dominance (a blend — pink) vs. codominance (both shown at once — AB). The classic distractor pair.
Sex-linked inheritance & pedigrees
Genes on the X chromosome show sex-linked patterns: X-linked recessive traits (color blindness, hemophilia) appear far more in males, who are hemizygous (one X). Pedigrees track inheritance across generations.
Males (XY) have only one copy of X-linked genes, so a single recessive allele is expressed — that's why X-linked recessive disorders are more common in males, and why an affected father passes the allele to all daughters (carriers) but no sons. Pedigree clues: a trait that skips generations and affects mostly males suggests X-linked recessive; a trait in every generation affecting both sexes suggests autosomal dominant.
Penetrance, epistasis, pleiotropy & polygenic traits
Penetrance (fraction of genotypes that show the phenotype) and expressivity (how strongly); epistasis (one gene masks another); pleiotropy (one gene, many effects); polygenic (many genes, one trait, e.g. height).
Real inheritance is messier than one-gene-one-trait. Epistasis is one gene's product masking another gene's expression (e.g., coat-color genes). Pleiotropy is the reverse — a single gene affecting many traits (sickle-cell affects blood, spleen, pain, infection resistance). Polygenic traits (height, skin color) are controlled by many genes and show continuous variation. Incomplete penetrance explains why some carriers of a "dominant" disease allele never show it.
Mitochondrial (cytoplasmic) inheritance
Genes in mitochondrial DNA are inherited only from the mother (the egg supplies the cytoplasm and its mitochondria; sperm contribute essentially none). So an affected mother passes the trait to all her children, and an affected father passes it to none — the classic give-away pedigree pattern.
Because mitochondria are maternally (cytoplasmically) inherited, mitochondrial-DNA disorders (e.g., Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy, MERRF) ignore the nuclear rules entirely: every child of an affected woman is at risk regardless of sex, and the line dies out through affected males. Expression is variable (heteroplasmy — cells carry a mix of normal and mutant mitochondria), so severity differs even among siblings. This is the fourth pedigree pattern to recognize alongside autosomal and X-linked inheritance (see sex-linked inheritance & pedigrees).
Don't confuse
Maternal mitochondrial inheritance (mom → all kids; dad → none) vs. X-linked recessive (more males, can pass through carrier mothers, an affected father → all daughters carriers but no sons). The tell for mitochondrial: affected fathers never transmit it.
How AAMC tests it
A pedigree where an affected mother has every child affected — and no affected father ever transmits — points straight to mitochondrial/cytoplasmic inheritance.
Meiosis & the sources of variation
Meiosis makes four genetically unique haploid gametes from one diploid cell, through two divisions. Three processes generate the variation: crossing over, independent assortment, and random fertilization.
Meiosis halves the chromosome number and reshuffles alleles. It's the source of nearly all heritable diversity (mutation aside), which is why it's so heavily tested.
Meiosis I vs. meiosis II
Meiosis I is reductional — homologous chromosomes separate (diploid → haploid). Meiosis II is equational — sister chromatids separate (like mitosis). The result: 4 haploid cells.
In prophase I, homologous chromosomes pair (synapsis) into tetrads/bivalents and exchange segments at chiasmata (crossing over). In metaphase I tetrads line up and assort independently; in anaphase I the homologs separate (sister chromatids stay together) — this is the reduction to haploid. Meiosis II then separates the sister chromatids, like a mitotic division, yielding four haploid cells.
The three sources of genetic variation
Crossing over (prophase I — recombines linked alleles), independent assortment (metaphase I — random orientation of tetrads), and random fertilization together make each gamete and each offspring genetically unique.
Crossing over swaps segments between homologs, creating new allele combinations on a chromosome. Independent assortment means each homolog pair orients randomly at metaphase I, giving 2ⁿ possible gamete combinations (n = haploid number; 2²³ for humans). Random fertilization multiplies that by the variation in the other gamete. These are the engines of diversity meiosis provides.
Meiosis vs. mitosis
Mitosis: one division → 2 diploid, identical cells (growth/repair). Meiosis: two divisions → 4 haploid, unique gametes, with synapsis and crossing over (only in meiosis).
The discriminators AAMC tests: mitosis has no synapsis and no crossing over; meiosis I pairs homologs and recombines them. Mitosis preserves chromosome number; meiosis halves it. Mitosis yields genetic clones; meiosis yields variation. (Mitosis itself is covered in cell division.)
Don't confuse
Sister chromatids separate in mitosis and in meiosis II; homologs separate only in meiosis I — the step that makes cells haploid.
Nondisjunction & aneuploidy
Nondisjunction is failure of chromosomes to separate properly, producing gametes with the wrong number (aneuploidy) — e.g. trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), XXY (Klinefelter), X0 (Turner).
If homologs fail to separate in meiosis I, or sister chromatids in meiosis II, a gamete ends up with an extra or missing chromosome. Fertilization then gives trisomy (three copies) or monosomy (one). Examples: trisomy 21 (Down), XXY (Klinefelter), X0 (Turner). Maternal age raises the risk.
Linkage, recombination & chromosomal mutations
Genes close together on the same chromosome are linked — inherited together unless crossing over separates them. Recombination frequency measures the distance between them. Whole chromosome segments can also mutate.
Independent assortment only holds for genes on different chromosomes or far apart on the same one. Linkage and recombination let geneticists map genes.
Recombination frequency & gene mapping
The farther apart two linked genes are, the more often crossing over separates them. 1% recombination = 1 map unit (centimorgan); a recombination frequency of 50% means the genes assort independently (effectively unlinked).
Because crossovers occur roughly at random along a chromosome, the chance of a crossover between two loci rises with the distance between them. So recombination frequency is a proxy for distance: 1% recombinants = 1 centimorgan. The maximum is 50% — at that point the genes behave as if unlinked (on different chromosomes or very far apart).
Chromosomal mutations
Large-scale changes: deletion (segment lost), duplication (segment repeated), inversion (segment flipped), and translocation (segment moved to another chromosome).
These differ from the point mutations of 1B by acting on whole chromosome segments. They often arise from errors in crossing over or repair, and can disrupt many genes at once.
Population genetics & evolution
Zoom out from individuals to the gene pool. Hardy–Weinberg gives the allele/genotype frequencies expected with no evolution; the forces that break its assumptions (selection, drift, gene flow, mutation, nonrandom mating) are evolution in action.
Population genetics is where genetics meets evolution. Hardy–Weinberg is the null model — a non-evolving baseline — and any deviation points to one of the evolutionary forces.
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
With two alleles at frequencies p and q: p + q = 1 and p² + 2pq + q² = 1, where p² = homozygous dominant, 2pq = heterozygous, q² = homozygous recessive. It holds only if the population is not evolving.
Hardy–Weinberg lets you compute genotype frequencies from allele frequencies (and back). The classic move: a recessive disease frequency gives q², so q = √(q²), then p = 1 − q, and carriers = 2pq. The five assumptions (the conditions for no evolution): no mutation, no gene flow (migration), no natural selection, random mating, and a large population (no genetic drift). Violate any one and allele frequencies shift.
Forces of evolution
Allele frequencies change through natural selection, genetic drift (random change, strong in small populations — bottleneck and founder effects), gene flow (migration), mutation (the ultimate source of new alleles), and nonrandom mating.
Natural selection is non-random and adaptive — it favors the fittest (those with the most reproductive success). Genetic drift is random and matters most in small populations: a bottleneck (population crash) or founder effect (a few individuals start a new population) can fix or lose alleles by chance. Gene flow mixes alleles between populations; mutation introduces brand-new alleles. Only mutation creates variation; the others redistribute it.
Directional, stabilizing & disruptive selection
Directional selection favors one extreme (shifts the mean); stabilizing favors the intermediate (narrows variation); disruptive favors both extremes against the middle (can drive speciation).
Picture the trait's bell curve: directional selection pushes it toward one tail (e.g., antibiotic resistance), stabilizing selection trims both tails toward the average (e.g., human birth weight), and disruptive selection hollows out the middle, favoring the two extremes.
Fitness & speciation
Fitness = reproductive success. Speciation is the formation of new species when populations become reproductively isolated — allopatric (geographic separation) or sympatric (without geographic separation).
Evolutionary fitness is measured in offspring, not strength. Speciation happens when gene flow stops and populations diverge until they can no longer interbreed (reproductive isolation). Allopatric speciation follows a physical barrier; sympatric speciation occurs within the same area (e.g., via polyploidy in plants or niche divergence).
Convergent vs. divergent evolution; homologous vs. analogous structures
Divergent evolution: related species grow different from a common ancestor (one lineage splits). Convergent evolution: unrelated species evolve similar traits independently because they face similar pressures. Homologous structures share ancestry (same origin, maybe different function); analogous structures share function but not ancestry.
Homologous structures (e.g., the bat wing, human arm, and whale flipper — same bones rearranged) are evidence of common ancestry and arise by divergent evolution. Analogous structures (e.g., a bat wing vs. a bird wing, or insect vs. bird wings) do the same job but evolved separately — the signature of convergent evolution. Parallel evolution is the in-between case: related lineages independently evolve similar traits after diverging. Vestigial structures (the human appendix, tailbone) are reduced remnants of ancestral organs — more evidence of descent with modification.
Don't confuse
Homologous = same origin (common ancestor; think divergent); analogous = same function (independent origin; think convergent). The bat-wing-vs-bird-wing pairing is the canonical analogous/convergent example; bat-wing-vs-human-arm is the homologous/divergent one. (Note: "homologous" here means evolutionary homology — distinct from homologous chromosomes in meiosis.)
How AAMC tests it
Given two structures, decide whether their similarity reflects shared ancestry (homologous/divergent) or independent adaptation to a similar environment (analogous/convergent).
Worked question
In a large, randomly mating population at Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, a recessive condition affects 1 in 100 individuals. What fraction of the population are carriers (heterozygous)?